Tootsie of the week: give it up Keith!

Break out your kleenex folks, this week’s tootsie has had a £60,000 SRS (lop off my dick, make me a mangina) but is really pissed off that the NHS won’t do a freebie (£5,000) fake breast surgery – he insists that without the fake boobs, he is ‘half man, half woman’. LOL, if Keith really thinks that silicone bags in his chest will make him ‘all woman’, then he really should have a long, hard look in the mirror. Dude, even with your ‘funbags’ installed, you will pass for a female about as much as I pass for a giraffe.

Here’d be the sob story (I pick the Lancashire Telegraph, but all other news stories are word for word):

Burnley transexual left ‘in limbo’ after NHS refuses to fund breast op

A BURNLEY transsexual says she has been left ‘half man, half woman’ after doctors refused her breast surgery.

Cathy Ann Daniels, 57, formerly known as Keith Stanstead Daniels, underwent a £60,000 sex change in London 18 months ago.

But the former builder, who has three children, claims her GP in Burnley will not refer her for a £5,000 breast operation on the NHS to complete her transformation.

Health bosses said breast augmentation was a cosmetic procedure, not routinely funded by NHS East Lancs.

Burnley MP Gordon Birtwistle said cosmetic surgery ‘must come second’ in the wake of health service cuts, but a transgender charity has branded the move a ‘geographic lottery’.

Miss Daniels, of Redvers Street, said: “I have been left half man, half woman because my doctor will not refer me to the PCT for breast augmentation.

“I have undergone half the operation, but now I’m being kept in limbo because apparently there is no funds.

“Breasts are a really important part of being a woman and being like this is making me suicidal.

“It’s horrible. I’m neither one or the other. My lower half is a woman but my top half is a man.”

Michelle Bridgman, of the Gender Society, said: “This has always been a geographic lottery.

“Some PCTs will fund and some simply will not.”

Miss Daniels said she realised she was trapped in the wrong body when she was just eight years old.

She was bullied for being different and only had female friends.

“When I was 13, I had a female friend who was helping the army cadets run a jumble sale,” she said.

“She dared me to put on a swimming costume and I did. From that moment all doubts went out of the window.”

She said her condition led to four marriages breaking down.

“Each time they left me because they caught me cross dressing,” she added.

Miss Daniels moved to Burnley from Hampshire a year ago after meeting her new partner online.

She said: “He is the only thing that stops me doing anything silly but he knows how much I need to have the second part of this operation.”

Now she intends to fight the decision through the courts.

“This is affecting my life badly and suppressing my human rights,” she added.

Miss Daniels, who also has HIV, has enlisted the help of transsexual Miranda Lee, 40, from Southend who made headlines in 2009 after she won her case against her PCT for the right to breast augmentation on the NHS.

Burnley MP, Gordon Birtwistle is supporting the NHS.

“Money should be spent on life-saving and urgent-care treatment rather than on cosmetic surgery.

“With everything that has happened in Burnley, including the closure of the children’s ward and A&E department, cosmetic procedures have to become a second priority.”

An East Lancs PCT spokesman confirmed breast augmentation was considered a cosmetic procedure and was not routinely funded by the NHS East Lancashire.

He added: “Currently breast reconstruction is only funded following mastectomy for patients who have had breast cancer.”

He said exceptional cases could be submitted to the Individual Funding Request Panel.

The panel decision is then based solely in clinical terms.

Personal, social or psychological circumstances will not be taken into consideration.

Firstly, it is not clear if Daniels himself paid for the £60,000 SRS – if he did, then he can surely scrape together another £5k for the boobs? However, I reckon the £60k mangina op was probably also funded by the NHS, and jeezusfuckingchrist, he wants the cash-strapped, making people (mainly female people) redundant as-we-speak NHS to cough up more freebie ops for him. I gather so that he and his also self-hating-gayness partner can play at happy het couple. (Remind me again why the T is in the alphabet?)

Cry me a river dude.

Buy yourself some ‘chicken fillets’ and strut around Burnley Lancashire foolin’ no-one but yourself (and your new boyfriend).

And just maybe, a few more women can keep their jobs at the NHS.

*fuck you dude*

EDITED TO ADD:

I thought I would do a minor crop on Keith’s photo. If I showed that picture to anyone on the street, the reply would likely be along the lines of “he looks like builder (from Lancashire)”. Most definitely no one in their right mind would mistake him for a woman. And everyone, except for Keith, his doctors and his boyfriend are going to assume he is packing penis under those jeans.

I would guess that he is an autogynephiliac, who watched way too much porn back in his het days, and only gets himself turned on by his ‘female bits’ – hence he really makes no effort elsewhere to appear female. I predicted below that he will likely turn out to be a regretter, especially after he gets his moobs, because he does so enjoy male privilege and will get very pissy when people actually do start mistaking him for a woman and treating him like one.

91 thoughts on “Tootsie of the week: give it up Keith!

  1. DaveSquirrel Post author

    This week’s tootsie is courtesy of Jason, who is trying really hard to get closer to the edge of The Wall.

    Come the revolution, DaveSquirrel is Commander in Charge of those who will put up against The Wall. My short title is “Dave Squirrel, Commander of Operation Wall”. You will address me as such.

    Like

    Reply
  2. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Ummm, yeah. So lets go wild!
    My internal jendah is squirrel, taxpayers should surely be PAYING for me to flounce about with a grafted tail, rather than the clip-on that I now have to endure! So fuck it, I don’t care how many NHS workers loose their jobs, as long as I have a grafted tail!

    Because dammit, I am *suicidal* if I don’t get my grafted tail! mwaaaahhhhhh

    Like

    Reply
  3. twanzmooselike

    I love the pose.

    Breasts? Hmmm. More important work to be done Keith. And what luck! They *are* doing face transplants in France. And it is a crime against hoomanity so no doubt you’ll be able to jump the queue.

    Like

    Reply
  4. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Indeed, they are silicone bags to simulate female breasts.

    But this is the whole phallacy of the twanz thing, artificial enhancements to appear to be something you are not. Even on a FAB they aren’t a good thing.
    As well as potentially dangerous and life threatening.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Nicky

    And he wants taxpayers to pay for the whole thing. What the heck is he smoking or taking. It sure seems to me that he needs the insane asylum more than the surgery. I don’t believe that taxpayers money should not be footing the bill for this guys crap. They should have made him pay for it himself, not the taxpayers.

    Like

    Reply
  6. Bev Jo

    As you all said, this is so revolting and infuriating on so many levels. Why on earth should the man’s female-hating fantasies be paid for by other people? Would they if he was one who pretended to be transspecies? And what the hell does a silicon, toxic bag have to do with being female? (I know you all said this, but I have to join in.) And that face! Here’s another long-time het man with kids who’s decided to do this late in life. All just so female-hating, and so selfish/self-centered/self obsessed. Thanks, Dave!

    Like

    Reply
  7. GallusMag

    He’s suicidal because his moobs are too small for his liking and he believes flat chested women aren’t “real” women. Jesus. These guys are always “suicidal” over one thing or another. The goal of transformation is never ever reached. There’s always that next step. First steroids, then hair, then voice, then name change, then surgeries, legal document changes, constant dilation, surgical revisions, FFS, etc. Always a next step on the transformative agenda to get oneself closer to a goal that can NEVER be reached. Christ when you listen to the old timers who’ve been post “transition” for 30 years recounting their never ending rejection from the “secret society of women” that they still don’t have access to because women just never “read” them as FEMALE, no matter what they look like or how long they’ve been doing it.
    The ones that never come to term with the fact that they CAN’T BE FEMALE seem to lose their everlovin’ minds. These guys just don’t know when to quit.
    It’s incredible how effectively the trans establishment has undermined every effort to provide alternative treatment for guys like this who are seemingly suffering from obsessive-compulsive Body dysphoria syndrome. And undermine research into treatment options designed to decrease symptoms. What about trans who have medical issues that prevent the use of supposedly therapeutic cosmetic medical body-mods? They are shit out of luck. The trans are so terrified that someone will stop the next “step” of their Trans-ition, because they just know that the next step will be the one where the magic happens. But it never does.

    Like

    Reply
  8. DaveSquirrel Post author

    The whole ‘next stage’ in a series of endless stages is very narcissistic.

    He is delusional if he thinks moobs will make him ‘woman’. He still looks like a builder-dude in heels, with moobs he will look like a builder-dude in heels with moobs.

    I actually peg this one as a regretter down the line.

    Like

    Reply
  9. Nicky

    Also this begs the question what is the feminist and women’s view of intersex people. How do are they able to distinguish between intersex and twanz people.

    Like

    Reply
  10. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Nicky, I am not sure of the percentages, but I believe a high number of intersex are raised as girls, which gives us the shared upbringing. They are not role playing and faking womanhood or anything else. Hence the full acronym is FAAB (female assigned at birth) which is inclusive of any intersex raised as girls. Of the youtubes that I have seen, I see many tranz who probably look way more feminine that I am, with their full-on make-up and hair. Yet when they open their mouths and speak, that is when they out themselves as male pretending to be female. So it is not looks as much as deep down attitudes – and that is the part that most twanz don’t get, or ever will get.

    Like

    Reply
  11. m Andrea

    It’s just kind of ridiculous that somebody who looks like a biological male should expect anybody else to believe he’s female, or treat him in the manner in which he assumes females “should be” treated. The problem, from my perspective, is that this is clearly 1) a man 2) who is delusional. Two strikes. Right off the bat I assume he will get violent rather quickly. I’m not even getting into the irrational “but he fweels like a squirrel on the inside”, this is just about how his physiology appears to other people. He’s also gonna need his humerus, radius and ulna bones shaved. They’re way too huge and it’s not just muscle which is the problem.

    Anyway. Gallus has a really excellent point about the “next step” routine.

    Nicky, not sure what you mean by “distinguish”. Do you mean just identifying them on the street or theoretical applications to a system of oppression? The vast vast majority of intersex folks, who were born with visibly ambiguous genitalia, get extremely frustrated from a very young age by other people who keep trying to literally *squash their genitalia into a narrow set of personality traits*, and so they are not the type of people who would appear to others as obviously being one sex while trying to wear the clothes which are associated with another sex. In other words, if you can tell it’s a guy in a dress, then it’s not intersex. It is quite obvious to intersex folks, that other people are stupidly ascribing personality traits to a piece of flesh.

    Like

    Reply
  12. m Andrea

    Hey Nicky, aren’t you intersex? Instead of asking how other people interpret your situation, why not tell other people where their interpretation falls apart? 🙂

    Like

    Reply
  13. Nicky

    @m Andrea, What I mean by “distinguish”, is that can women tell the difference between someone who is born with an intersex condition such as Kallmann’s syndrome, Klinefeltners syndrome, CAH and AIS vs someone who is twanz and trying to pretend to be a jendah and pretending to be intersex. I try to tell ask how other people interpret my situation and to this day I am still trying to find out where their interpretation falls apart. Yes I am intersex.

    @DaveSquirrel, Do feminist and women’s group excuse intersex people because they had no choice in being born into an intersex condition. What is the feminist and FAAB’s view of intersex people.

    Like

    Reply
  14. m Andrea

    Imagine a tiger who thinks he’s a housecat. All I see is a tiger so hey expect me to be quite leery around him. So first, he’s gonna have to LOOK LIKE a housecat before I would ever consider treating him as harmless. But then, even when he does look like a housecat, well come to find out he’ll still start trying to eat me the first chance he gets. Because even from a very young age, he found people like me to be quite tasty.

    And of course the transgendered response is that tigers don’t ever eat people like me so therefore it’s rude to protect myself from housecats who think they’re tigers AND tigers who think they’re housecats.

    Like

    Reply
  15. m Andrea

    Nicky, I personally do not consider a medical disorder to be relevant when discussing fucked up gender roles. By that, I don’t mean that all the health issues etc which intersex folks must deal with are unimportant, just that the *intersection* which supposedly exists between intersex and trans is a red herring. Trans will drag intersex into discussions simply as a means of confusing people.

    Which is why I will minimize that intersection every time.

    Are you concerned that radical feminists are minimizing the health problems which intersex folks must deal with?

    Like

    Reply
  16. m Andrea

    oh, and like Dave the squirrel, I believe that since an intersex person was socialized from birth as a female, then if she wants to be included with all things woman then sure, seems reasonable. The bright line, for me, is *socialization from birth*. Were they born a tiger or were they born being socialized as a tiger or do they have fond hopes of being a tiger? Well, if the answer to any of those is yes, then they need to stay in the tiger area.

    Like

    Reply
  17. Nicky

    @m Andrea “just that the *intersection* which supposedly exists between intersex and trans is a red herring. Trans will drag intersex into discussions simply as a means of confusing people.”
    That I see it all the time and on the internet in places such as Youtube where you see a whole bunch of trans who believe intersex is part of them or they piggyback off the intersex people. The only concern I have is their are some in society who think that intersex people such as myself are somehow related to trans. When it’s clear that intersex is not Trans. I am also concern that their are some trans who are using the intersex as a red herring to either confuse people or claim that they are intersex.

    Like

    Reply
  18. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Nicky, I think you will find that radfems have a clear distinction between intersex and twanz.
    The piggybacking I think all came from twanz, in order to legitimise their situation and garner sympathy. That might work on the libfems, but not on the radfems.

    Like

    Reply
  19. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Welcome back T.Laurel, long time no see!

    Apparently breasts – real or fake – are a human rights issue (thanks Rebel !)
    At least their audacity knows no bounds.

    In some parts of the country, I think they can get electrolysis (free?) on the NHS. FAB-women cannot. Must be nice to be born and raised a bloke, demanding stuff, and frequently getting it because you throw a tantrum like a pre-schooler. I might just write to the UN and ask them to amend human rights violations to include: “putting up with demanding/arrogant males is a violation of women’s human rights”.

    Like

    Reply
  20. parallelexistence

    Nicky, I think you will find that radfems have a clear distinction between intersex and twanz.

    Absolutely. The first is a biological reality, the second a set of delusions and behaviours rooted in misogynistic gender roles and other assorted male hang-ups.

    I think the well-meaning general public and libfem types do get confused though, and part of that is to do with a notion that says to be a “good person” you must be *tolerant* and no-one’s feelings must ever be hurt (100x so if it’s a male person’s feelings of course) and the worst thing that you can be is [whatever]phobic.

    So they end up believing any old bullshit, instead of addressing 1) biological realities 2) actual social inequities around access to resources 3) other male violences, including 4) the farce of gender essentialism and 5) the way that misogynistic male pathologies manifest in general.

    Or they may look at little bits of each of these but never really join the dots, whereas to a rad fem it is obvious … dot dot dot … very clear line.

    Like

    Reply
  21. ball buster

    Hilarious post, Fabbity!

    Two things bother me (about the article, not your post).

    1. There are women in the world who can’t get cancer out of their breasts (or breast reconstructive therapy for that matter), because they can’t afford it, and it never makes headline news. They will put pink ribbons on everything, but they won’t write a story about a poor woman who can’t afford treatment for a medical procedure that is directly life threatening. But they will write a story about a man who can’t get sacs of refined petroleum put in his chest.

    2. They bring up HIV, and this is problematic to me because men who have HIV are universally sympathized with; while women are left stigmatized and treated like damaged goods (as if we aren’t already damaged goods for every other reason in the book). They did this with the Amanda Knox case. People spread rumors that she thought the was HIV positive, that wasn’t the case. The “doctor” lied to her, saying that she was, and needed the list of men she had slept with to notify them. He handed that list promptly to the press, who used it to slutshame her. Italian prosecutors went as far as to say she was “dirty on the inside.”

    And good crop of the shoes, Fab. It really does illustrate how nobody would have noticed his personal issues if he’d just worn a pair of sensible loafers. But sheesh, these guys live for expressing to the world just how fucked up they are, because it garners instant sympathy.

    Like

    Reply
  22. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Back with gusto BB – we missed you!

    In the UK I think it is better getting actual cancer treatment, not sure about the reconstruction, but I have the feeling it does get a lower priority. Of course, with all these menz laydees demanding silicone sacs, it puts even more pressure on the NHS. And yes, the dudes make a big fuss in the papers, and the women awaiting reconstruction just have wait quietly until the NHS get around to it.

    So right about him trying to go for more sympathy points by mentioning the HIV. Frequently the papers will mention “so and so got it from a blood transfusion back in…” so when they don’t mention it, it is usually due to unprotected sex.

    Something I didn’t mention in the post (well, I did knock it out in all of 15 minutes) was to highlight:
    She said her condition led to four marriages breaking down.
    “Each time they left me because they caught me cross dressing,” she added.

    Yeah, right. One marriage perhaps, two marriages an outside maybe, but FOUR? It shows his character by not telling wives #2, #3, #4. However, I reckon there would be way more to it than just his cross-dressing, he looks to be a porn hound, and was probably obsessive/controlling/freaky during sex. That stuff will frequently get dudes divorced.

    And notice the usual bullshit twanz script as well:
    Miss Daniels said she realised she was trapped in the wrong body when she was just eight years old.
    She was bullied for being different and only had female friends.
    “When I was 13, I had a female friend who was helping the army cadets run a jumble sale,” she said.
    “She dared me to put on a swimming costume and I did. From that moment all doubts went out of the window.”

    And I remind everyone of my point in the previous paragraph, he was ‘certain’ at 13, then a lot melodrama about the four wives not understanding his simple widdle cross-dressing. Well there again, it was not just simple widdle cross-dressing was it? Gawd, it’s almost like they pick up these sob story scripts from The Tranny Handbook.

    You are right about the Amanda Knox thing too. I was reading some of the old newspaper articles this morning. They apparently just told her she had HIV specifically to get a list of males she had slept with. But notice the double standard, no such ex-partner list for either of the dudes in the case, just her. And I will bet each one of the dudes has slept with more than seven females too.

    Like

    Reply
  23. ball buster

    I missed you all too!

    One thing I forgot to mention, I don’t understand the relevance of being HIV positive has to do with this dude wanting a boob job. My guess is that it’s to garner sympathy, and to impress some kind of urgency to fill his demands. That somehow his life is going to be cut short, therefore health services should hurry up and get it done so he can enjoy his feminization while he can. It’s a classic male tactic to get what they want. I’ve had a man tell me that he has a fatal heart defect and that he would die before reaching thirty, therefore I should put out to him. Nope, I refuse.

    Can you imagine what the reaction would be, if a woman were to demand to get breast implants paid for by public health because she just wasn’t happy with her body? So why do TWs get special treatment? Because they’re men of course. This is why gender identity doesn’t matter at all. Born maleness will always be prioritized above born femaleness.

    And women are never allowed to feel happy about their bodies, no matter what. At least here in America, someone will find something wrong with you no matter what. Too fat, too skinny, too this too that. Nose too long. Eyes too close together. Sheesh. We grow up feeling ashamed for everything, and TWs act like they’re the only ones to ever feel body shame.

    Like

    Reply
  24. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    Dave, I’m always here–I mean, I read faithfully, but don’t often feel I have much to add to the general brilliance (seriously).

    @ ball buster, obviously we must Let Him Die A Woman!

    A Doris Wishman exploito-pic starring Harry Reems. If I ever go back to ‘Flixing discs, I’ll probably review this thing.

    Like

    Reply
  25. Bev Jo

    Well, part of the signed contract for het marriage is that the woman expects to get some of the privilege of being with a man for her services, whether all the money benefits or showing off the man on her arm in public. But if hubby is dressing like men’s idea of a woman, he’s breaking his part of the deal, so no wonder they left him. I mean, besides his lovely appearances.

    Andrea, you are right about the bone surgery. But they should start with the skull, and then brain transplant. And you are right about the whole con being we are trained/ordered to not recognize the danger — yet, these female impersonators are known for being dangerous and violent.

    Oh that video! If only they did just play at men’s idea of women and hang out with men and paint their fingernails (toxic exposure) and leave us the fuck alone.

    Nicky, from the intersex I’ve seen on TV, those saying they were raised as girls and who identify as female, sure look and feel like females to me. Not a bit of the posturing, tantruming, narcissism, and MALENESS of these men (trans). To me, it’s beyond how someone is raised also, because a boy raised as a girl does not have that feeling. There is spirit, mind, soul, etc. I hate it that these disgusting female-hating men try to use and identify with your oppression.

    Also, so many intersex women and Lesbians have been mutilated against their will by doctors, yet these pricks are begging and demanding mutilation. I feel like we are so oppressed and our communities being destroyed by these men, but, really, it’s even worse for intersex women.

    Like

    Reply
  26. Nicky

    @Bev Jo I have seen many twanz who try to claim and identify as an intersex person just so they can garner sympathy from the Real Biological born intersex person. I have seen them try and steal the intersex name and pretend to be intersex without ever naming what type of intersex condition they are born with. It wouldn’t surprise me if I hear a twanz pretending to be intersex to get pass the gate keepers to get their SCAM. It just show how audacious twanz can be to get what they want at the expense of Biological born women and intersex people.

    Like

    Reply
  27. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Spot on again BB, I too thought the HIV thing was totally irrelevant, and yes, a “better give him boobies because he is on death’s door”. The thing is that many with HIV don’t go on to develop AIDS. Which reminds me of my old flat mate many years ago, HIV+ gay dude, who was living on benefits for his condition. Except that there was nothing wrong with him day to day, had plenty of energy to party/shag, and do volunteer work. That was 15 years ago, not sure if they get automatically on benefits now. The thing about breast cancer patients is that most of them will die within 5 years (many don’t survive past 5 years).

    Gosh that clip TLS, surreal !
    The music!
    But you know, I’d be really happy if the jendah shit could be reversed, the dudes could waste all their time primping and preening, and we could just roll out of bed and throw on clothes (which is sort of what I do now really, so gosh, I must rilly be a manz!).

    Nicky yes, I too get very pissed off when twanz claim to be intersex (or sometimes “just like intersex”) and say stuff like “I need the surgeries to correct a birth defect”. Important to say surgeries really, because it is rarely just one op, it is a series. What is the word (not exactly hypochondria) for peeps that seek out lots of medical treatment (and the attention) just for the sake of it? It looks like some just enjoy the process, the hospital treatments, the attention by doctors and medical staff.

    Me, I am the opposite. Hate hospitals. I have had four abdominal surgeries, and checked myself out of the hospital every single time, can’t stand being trapped in there.

    Like

    Reply
  28. rebel13

    What is the word (not exactly hypochondria) for peeps that seek out lots of medical treatment (and the attention) just for the sake of it? It looks like some just enjoy the process, the hospital treatments, the attention by doctors and medical staff.

    Munchausen syndrome.

    Like

    Reply
  29. twanzmooselike

    Most of the doctors they are seeing (if not all) are male. They just love the idea of their parts being handled, talked about, analyzed…and they themselves being the topic of discussion, by male doctors. Who are of course being PAID to do that. I think these male patients use these sessions as jerk off fodder and to validate their delusions. I’m a woman, I flirted with my psych and he loooved it. Anyway, It’s a very distorted “reality” and the come-down is going to be hard. Damned if I’ll be paying for any of it. SRS or “recovery” psychiatry after the fall. Think of all the valid and necessary women’s surgeries which are punted off to the end of the waiting lists in universal systems while these tools suck up the budgets.

    Not about SRS, but related, Google Thomas Sczas (sp?) for his essay on why psychiatry isn’t a medical profession.

    Like

    Reply
  30. Nicky

    That’s what the vast majority of twanz suffer from, which is Munchausen syndrome. They like to believe that by claiming intersex, that they can get SRS without the gate keepers. Some twanz even see intersex as an excuse or alibi for who they are without the DNA testing to prove it. As a result it cheapens what it means to be born intersex and it makes Real Biological born intersex people look bad.

    Like

    Reply
  31. DaveSquirrel Post author

    ah yes Nicky, and after they have finished appropriating the intersex case, they then go and appropriate woman-world – getting profitable discrimination law suits, taking/occupying jobs in place of women (in the equality headcount), and barging into our restrooms to preen themselves and strut about.

    Like

    Reply
  32. DaveSquirrel Post author

    twanzmooselike, you gave me some very bad visual images there, but yep, I agree that many get off on the whole flirting thing – it’s all (apparently) one of things that *proves* they are ‘a woman’. When most of us fabs are really sick of male attention and perviness.

    Like

    Reply
  33. ball buster

    omg laurel that was hilarious!

    Fab, yep HIV can be manageable, especially how with medication it is not a death sentence like it used to be. I’m glad to hear that your flatmate did some volunteer work while on benefits. I like to think if my own condition gets to that point, that I would do the same by volunteering my time to helping women.

    @ nicky, I think increasing awareness about intersex people would be easier if it weren’t for all the gender politics clouding mainstream media. Not just the transpoliticians, but mainstream liberals who substitute gender issues when women speak up about concerns that are physiological in nature. Gender doesn’t exist, and therefore would be a complete nonissue if it weren’t for men poking their noses into feminist politics and insisting that it exists and matters. It matters to them because gender is how they convince women that PIV is compulsory. Demanding women put out PIV and simultaneously slutshaming them emotionally extorts women into things like marriage, childrearing, and the workplace to support those children. That is how you transform a woman from an autonomous individual to a reproductive wage slave – make her feel obligated to men and society. As long as women are busy with society’s unpaid labor and working 2 or 3 low paying jobs, there’s little room for dissent, and political or economic activity that would translate into a threat to men. Gender politics benefit men and erase intersex by setting up two rigid roles – male and female, or D/s. Any state of being outside of this directly threatens that narrowminded worldview, and is therefore target for erasure by Patriarchy.

    Like

    Reply
  34. Nicky

    I think it would be easier if intersex awareness were more known, but the problem is that twanz would try and hijack it and claim it for their own. The problem where it stands right now, is that you see twanz using everything and anything to try and claim legitimacy for what they are. I’m not surprise that Keith character is not using the intersex excuse. Though if he did, it would anger intersex people real fast.

    Like

    Reply
  35. ball buster

    I completely agree, Nicky. Trans are claiming anything and everything they can to legitimize their movement/politics. I even saw a transwoman say that he would reclaim the term “radical feminism” to define the transgender movement.

    I see the same thing with trans claiming intersex (or at least, a “psychological” intersex – no such thing!), and I don’t see how they are able to get away with this. Legitimizing gender identity as the same as intersex; supports the very Patriarchal concepts that harms intersex people to begin with. The idea that a person can only be male or female (no room for true variance), and therefore must at least look that way on the outside and be socialized as such. It doesn’t reflect reality at all. A firm grasp of reality and an appreciation of healthy minds and bodies isn’t required to sustain such a cultural ideal – but conformity and body mutilation are.

    Like

    Reply
  36. Bev Jo

    I so much agree, Dave, about wanting to not be near hospitals and doctors (I’m facing surgery in less than two weeks and being forced to have procedures/tests I do NOT want. The surgeon even has lied to me about why she wants me to have them. And she identifies as a “radical feminist!”)

    That’s another piece of it all: Money. If doctors refused to fill these men’s fantasies, they would be less likely to be making our lives hell and confusing women. I’ve even had a Radical Lesbian Feminist say to me, “But he’s a woman now.” Most doctors are criminals, and are the people who mutilate intersex babies and children, as well as killing so many people with their “treatments,” while denying other people health care.

    In the US, if a woman lives for 5 years after breast cancer treatment, she’s called a “survivor” for the statistics the doctors need to keep pushing radiation and chemotherapy, which kills you, causes heart, brain, neurological, etc. damage, causes secondary and more cancers, and destroys your immune system and will to live. My old friend, Linda Strega, has truly survived two separate, rare, fast-growing cancers with just surgery and alternative methods. She says refusing chemotherapy and radiation and CAT scans was crucial to her survival.

    Love what you all are saying about the transholes….

    Like

    Reply
  37. Nicky

    What your seeing is that twanz are trying to piggy back off of intersex people and women. You see them piggy back off of intersex people for all their hard work and advances that intersex people have done in terms of awareness. I have even see twanz trying to co-opt and claim that intersex people are part of them, just so they can legitimize their existence. At the expense of intersex people.

    Like

    Reply
  38. Wayward Victorian Aspie Lesbian

    To be honest, I can’t believe that a woman who calls herself a feminist would ridicule another woman like this for not being born with the same genitals. Keep in mind, I’m a FAAB(cisgender) lesbian feminist, but I also support the rights of trans* people.

    It’s not Miss Daniels’ fault that she doesn’t pass that well; ridiculing her for it, calling her a man, is pure anti-feminist, body-shaming bullshit. Trans women are just as female as cisgender women. I don’t care if you’re going to delete this comment; that’ll just prove that you’re a privileged douchebag who hates everyone not blatantly worshipping you.

    Like

    Reply
  39. DaveSquirrel Post author

    I can’t believe that a woman who calls herself a feminist would ridicule another woman like this for not being born with the same genitals.

    LOL, I approved this one, because it made me laugh!

    I am soooo glad, that as a lesbian feminist, you are more than comfortable with the large number of M2Ts, who are fetishists in one way or another. Or that it doesn’t creep you out that some are het males that basically call themselves ‘woman’ in order to get into women-only spaces like changing rooms in order to perv on them.

    Like

    Reply
  40. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Oh, and Wayward, I had a chuckle at yer blog.
    So, you are a teenager, basically telling someone old enough to be your granny that you knows it all! Well done you!

    I will not moderate comments on this blog. Expect to be called out on your bullshit if you decide to be a douchebag, though.

    Just to give you a heads’ up, on your vast knowledge of feminism, ‘douchebag’ is a sexist and anti-woman term. But call me in about 20 years when you do actually grow up and learn a bit about feminism, then we can talk. TTFN.

    Like

    Reply
  41. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    @Wayward, I for one don’t ridicule him because he “has different genitals.” In the first place, if I accept your argument that he’s a woman in the same way I am, he doesn’t have “different genitals,” because he’s had surgery. His constructed fuckhole is identical to my vagina, all the structures of my vulva including the clitoris, my cervix, uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries, right? He’s a woman and there’s nothing I can say or do to change that–so why are you so defensive on his account, I wonder?

    To call him a woman on the basis of his lacking a penis is to buy into the patriarchal/Freudian construct that a man is human because he has a penis and a woman is less than human because she hasn’t got a penis. Remove penis=no longer a man=this now-inferior creature must be shifted into category Woman, presumably with any other man whose behavior is not sufficiently masculine to merit his keeping his dick, like homosexual men and little boys who get caught crying (“the pussies”). Conversely, if a woman doesn’t act feminine enough, we would rather deem her a man than expand our category of what acceptable female behavior is. Put a dick on her! Instant man! It’s sexist as hell, and when trans people insist their reifying gender categories is somehow liberating us all from those same categories, I want to spit.

    But I realize it’s not really about the genitals for you. It’s about this fellow’s god given right to declare himself a woman. It’s about the duty of women everywhere to accept that preposterous fiction at the possible cost of our own identities and safety–to smile and nod and agree that yes, one more entitled little emperor really has got clothes on, like good little girls. Well, fuck that shit.

    Mr. Daniels is a man not merely because he was born with a penis, but because he has one X and one Y chromosome, was deemed male at birth and was raised male. Inverting his dick didn’t change his conditioning a bit. How do I know? He think he’s entitled to tits. Are you entitled to free government tits if you don’t like how the originals look? If not, then he’s not only “as much of a woman as you are,” he’s “MORE of a woman than you are.” Why? Because he retains male privilege. He can do *anything* better than teh bitchez do it, even “be female.” it’s further evidence of his privilege that he gets to judge whether he’s womanly enough yet, and to say he isn’t until he has the cup size he wants, because men are the judges of what a proper woman is, what a proper female body is, what proper female breasts and genitalia are.

    Like

    Reply
  42. Wayward Victorian Aspie Lesbian

    DaveSquirrel, age has nothing to do with this. This has to do with basic fucking knowledge of feminism. Feminism is not shaming your fellow women for their bodies. Assuming that a trans lesbian only goes to the women’s bathroom to creep on other women is just like all those straight girls assuming that I only go into their locker room to creep on them. A male bathroom is not a safe space for a woman, nor is a male locker room a safe space for me. And even then, if the trans woman doesn’t pass very well, she has a risk of being assaulted by cissexists.

    Like

    Reply
  43. twanzmooselike

    A vagina is an ORGAN not a surgically created hole to nowhere. I’m not surprised at the ignorance (and arrogance) of a teen though when some male gynes and internists are still denying the clitioris (for one part of this female specific system) in spite of the work of Dr. Helen O’Connell http://www.abc.net.au/quantum/scripts98/9825/clitoris.html. For one example.

    No matter what he has removed or tacked on, Keith is male. He can pretend he’s whatever he wants, but when he and his ilk start sucking up funds meant for the oppressed class known as women (of which you’re part?) that’s when he can expect pushback from radical feminists working FACT, not delusion.

    Like

    Reply
  44. Wayward Victorian Aspie Lesbian

    Funny, twanzmooselike, creating a functional clitoris is actually part of sexual reconstruction surgery for trans women. It is made from the tissue of the glans penis, which has nerves similar to a FAAB person’s clitoris. SRS does not only involve a vagina.

    Like

    Reply
  45. DaveSquirrel Post author

    LOL, I just let three of Wayward’s comments out of mod.

    DaveSquirrel, age has nothing to do with this. This has to do with basic fucking knowledge of feminism.
    And you might just want to obtain a basic fucking knowledge of biology, rather than your gender queer shit. btw, I have been a radfem longer than you have been on the planet. This actually makes a difference to my knowledge base – I actually do have a hell of a lot more stuff in my brain than you do. Deal with it baby. What the fuck else have I been doing for 30 years more, other than accumulate info? Or does knowledge accumulation suddenly stop at age 18? You are an idiot if you think that.

    I am not sure if T.Laurel wishes to come clean about her occupation, but your dig at her is rather “amusing”.

    And again, glans penis does not have the concentration of nerve endings that a REAL clitoris does.

    Anyway, if your comments continue along the stupid-but-not-amusing line, consider them trashed.

    Like

    Reply
  46. twanzmooselike

    Wayward (how apt!) surgeons cannot create a “functional clitoris”. Now you’re sounding like Galen’s 16th century biology which believed female genital were an inversion of the male. This is not a matter of opinion, but fact. Really can’t help you further here. I don’t have the time.

    Like

    Reply
  47. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    @ Wayward, I did misread that part. I also said, a few paragraphs in, that genitals aren’t really what we’re talking about–i.e., I agreed with you on that bit.

    So: I don’t ridicule him because he was *born with* different genitals. I ridicule him, if I have, because he refuses to accept reality, which has an unfortunate radfem bias in these matters. He has never been a woman. He will never be a woman. This is obvious to everyone who has not been brainwashed into the “because he says so” definition of what a woman is. He’s man who has had surgery to invert his penis. You may call the result a “vagina” all day long, but an opening in the body that ends “nowhere,” and which must be kept open with dilators lest it heal, is a wound, not a vagina. A vagina is a structure that is part of the female reproductive system. It ends in a cervix which generally leads to a uterus which is connected via fallopian tubes to a pair of ovaries. A trans person’s “vagina” is a hole that exists only for sexual pleasure.

    Still leaving genitalia out of it, what makes you a woman? The fact that you say you are, or something else? Because if we leave genitals out of it, that’s all this person has: I Am Woman. I Say So! How does this not rob the word “woman” of all meaning? And how does robbing the word “woman” of all meaning not render the very concept of feminism meaningless and stupid?

    I don’t make sense, really? With all my “complicated’ talk of what makes a female creature female and a male one male, which is widely accepted as fact UNLESS we’re talking about trans folks? What word confused you? “Privilege”? “Patriarchal”? Then you have a lot to learn.

    Like

    Reply
  48. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    I got a giggle out of that bit too, Dave. (-: But since I could concede that “point” of Wayward’s and still make my own points, I let it go. Yanno, seeing as how her entire argument against me is:

    Premise One: You misread me before you pointed out the thing you misread doesn’t even matter and is a point you will concede to me.
    Premise Two: I am confused.
    Conclusion: I WIN! I learned how to be a better feminist than all of you people put together in half the time!

    Like

    Reply
  49. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    In my last comment to Wayward, I meant to say “reality” and not “genitals” here:

    Because if we leave genitals out of it, that’s all this person has: I Am Woman. I Say So!

    If we leave *reality* (biology plus a lifetime of social conditioning) out of it, that’s all he has: “Pink Sparkle Jendah Magic, GO!” [cue transformation sequence]

    Like

    Reply
  50. Wayward Victorian Aspie Lesbian

    No, Snarkurchin, what confused me was your insistence that Miss Daniels is a homosexual man, and you base your entire argument off that conclusion. I’m perfectfly aware of privilege and the patriarchy, which I am seeking to destroy.in favour of equality. Miss Daniels does not have male privilege, you have cis-privilege. So do I, of course, but you refuse to acknowledge yours.

    Like

    Reply
  51. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Seriously Wayward, you need a reality check for the “Miss Daniels” bit. Jeez, he has clocked up four ex-wives, and even though he is now bonking a dude with his mangina, he still looks like a male builder from Lancashire. Also, we might just add at this point, for those lesbians slow to catch on, that a lot of this tranz stuff is counter-gay/lesbianism. Yep, Mr Daniels is now (sort of, and very badly) living a het lifestyle arrangement, just like Chaz Bono. Lesbian/gay stuff, out the window baby, it’s glorious het-technocolour!

    Like

    Reply
  52. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Oh, and I don’t think he is a homosexual man either. I think he is an autogynephile, and this is the actual extension of that (how else better to prove “all woman” than bonk a dude?). I can tell he is an autogyne because he makes FUCK ALL effort in the woman thing, just a pair of low heels. Look at the damn photo where I cropped the feet – he is still a dude. (With a mangina, but we only know that because of the sob story in the paper not getting freebie boobies)

    Like

    Reply
  53. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Actually, if you mention “cis-privilege” once more, you are totally banned. Does not matter how funny/amusing your next comment is, you will be gone.
    The reason is, the concept of “cis-privilege” when thrown at women, completely erases the need for feminism, it is therefore anti-feminist, and you can fuck off out the door with anti-feminist crap.

    Like

    Reply
  54. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    I don’t recall expressing any opinion about Mr. Daniels’ sexual orientation. I haven’t got any such opinion.

    And you’re correct: I do not acknowledge my [coughcough] “privilege.” Dave nailed that one. Anyway, you just go right on destroyin, Sugah.

    There’s no Radfem 101, is there? I like that.

    Like

    Reply
  55. Lilly (@Bruce_Lilly)

    Wayward you are nothing but an uneducated trash-talker. You have no idea about human biology just like the other deluded gender cultists. Go educate yourself before you post bullshit about “creating a functional clitoris” or that males are females. It baffles me that most/(all?) trans activists are SO uneducated. It’s pathetic! It doesn’t even make sense to have a discussion with them because they lack of basic knowledge about human biology. It’s like talking with kindergarten children. Also this cisgender crap is just beyond any sanity.
    1. gender is constructed – so I have a fictional privilege which exists only in the head of some crazies
    2. it’s a privilege to conform constructed gender roles? – that means that most mtfs have more cis privilege than me because I don’t give a fuck about conforming
    3. it implies that mtfs/ftms are in no way female/male – the trans ideology contradicts itself

    Like

    Reply
  56. ball buster

    Wayward Victorian, you say you are a leftist on your blog, which explains a lot to me. Mainstream liberalism is still run by doodz who think being born female means nothing. There’s nothing new about men telling women how good they have it while we are systematically pressganged into their patriarchal rape culture.

    I floundered for years in mainstream liberalism until it finally got into my thick skull that they will always put men first. No matter what. To illustrate, I turned on my television today and they are doing a special on bullying all next week on HLN/CNN media. Good news, right? Until I noticed the adverts only featured gay boys, geek boys, and fat boys being bullied, but no lesbian girls, geek girls, or fat girls. No nonwhite kids could be seen, either.

    It doesn’t get any more obvious than that males will always be prioritized over females, even in mainstream liberalism that claims to be so different from the rest of the nation. Even here, you are fiercely defending a transwoman against other FAABs, handing out the same bullshit line that we are privileged for not wanting to mutilate our bodies. So it’s not terrible enough that men target our bodies for violence and mutilation already, we must want to mutilate ourselves so men don’t have to go out of their way to do so. With this logic, it’s “privilege” for men to mutilate our bodies!11!1!1

    See how anti-woman this is? It’s anti-lesbian, too. Do you think Chastity Bono would have made it on Dancing with the Stars if it weren’t for her undergoing SRS to resemble a man? That way, Americans don’t have to see lesbians dancing together. Just another slice of why America isn’t nearly the progressive nation it claims to be.

    Like

    Reply
  57. Nicky

    It so much amazes me that people like Wayward who go to great lengths to cloud and muddy the waters of Human Biology. It makes you wonder where they get their education from. That’s why you see so many twanz people who muddy the waters and think that they are intersex.

    Like

    Reply
  58. Bev Jo

    “Cis” is an insulting, female-hating term made up by men to define real females out of existence. No other oppressed group that I know of has this done to them. Unless, of course, you count all the bigoted, nasty name-calling that the privileged call the oppressed. Reverse discrimination does not exist. It’s a right wing, male-identifed fantasy.

    How dare some of us get out of control and not accept any of men’s definitions for us? How on earth did real females get into a power position over men appropriating our identity and caricaturizing us?

    It’s way beyond biology, because, as in the case with intersex people, it’s also about mind, heart, spirit, soul. It’s even beyond how we females are raised with the majority of us sexually assaulted and ALL sexually harassed and humiliated. We grow up with media images ridiculing and humiliating us. There is a reason that men would pay a lot to go watch the female impersonators in the Sixties in San Francisco, while their wives hated it. Men love to see females ridiculed and humiliated, and that is what the men who identify as “trans” do. We are just a fetishized, caricaturized fantasy for them to appropriate.

    I have met far too many “transwomen” and have read even more. Show me just ONE that even remotely seems female or who seems to understand what it means to be female. I have never come across one. They can’t even write a short phrase without their female-hating pouring out. I still say, these men are the most female-hating of all. If they could skin us alive to make their “transition,” they would do it. So why does any woman support them other than that males are always valued over females?

    Like

    Reply
  59. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Wayward is languishing in the trash now, just more of the same. She called Ballbuster:
    “a standard conservative calling herself a feminist.”

    The ‘finale’ to the dumbass comment:
    “What the fuck. Being a lesbian doesn’t make you incapable of bigotry.”

    That, Wayward, is really Strike Three. Clearly know jackshit about anything. I recommend that you skulk off and hang around twanz blogs – they will love you. Here, no so much. As I said, call us in twenty years when you start to get a clue. I am saving you from yourself, publishing any more of your crap will out you as an ignorant idiot.

    Like

    Reply
  60. Nicky

    Wayward is one of those M2T who is about them. They like to think that their world evolves around them. At the same time, they like to disregard Biology and human biology. It makes you wonder why anyone would want to talk them, when they totally disregard human biology. Also that feminist angle, is nothing more than a smoke screen for wanting to enter female only space by pretending to support feminist. That’s almost the same line they say to Intersex people as well.

    Wayward is a classic example as to why women, feminist and intersex people should be very weary of any twanz who like to claim everything under the sun.

    Like

    Reply
  61. twanzmooselike

    Perverts like Wayward are using this type of invasion of women’s spaces as “proof” they are living as female. It justifies for the surgeons/psyches, who of course, don’t really need any justification, just hand over the cash boyo.

    Like

    Reply
  62. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Well, I was having a hard time believing that even a teenage FAB lesbian could be THAT clueless on feminism – and also so damn malecentric.

    Basically it was one stupid comment after another, each one trying to out-do the previous for levels of stupidity and ignorance.

    Like

    Reply
  63. twanzmooselike

    Who but a man would believe a knot of skin (penis inversion) = the complexity of the clitoris, vagina, vulva, the whole of a woman’s complex reproductive system.

    They’re women! They’re teen-age girls! They’re lesbians! They’re experts desperately trying to educate us!

    Like

    Reply
  64. twanzmooselike

    It sounded like an idiot. Check. And we know the vast majority of those are male. Check. It seemed incredibly unbelievable that a female could be that stupid. Check. What’s to blush?

    Like

    Reply
  65. DaveSquirrel Post author

    No worries. I had my suspicions (I had a raised eyebrow, just the one, as I read the comments). The “teen girl” crap is enough to set off alarm bells. But I am just more pissed at him using “I’m a FAAB(cisgender) lesbian feminist”, the FAAB term. That is an outright LIE. And I am so mad about such blatant lying, I am angry enough to “help” him with his twanzition.

    Like

    Reply
  66. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    That drives me nuts too, their appropriation of…well, everything, but especially FAAB. Every word there is for “woman,” these guys took, so we come up with abbreviations and acronyms to specifically mean “woman, and not in a trans way” and–nope! those belong to them too.

    Men!

    Like

    Reply
  67. DaveSquirrel Post author

    Yes, that is exactly it, TLS.
    There are others hijacking it with WBTS and WWBT etc.
    Originality is NOT their strong suit. They wouldn’t know it if it came up and bit them on the ass.

    Like

    Reply
  68. fabflowers

    i have had the same reaction from a woman-hating twanz in a lesbian forum of all places. it’s not a radfem area as such but one of them tried to hate on me for my beliefs. i chewed them a new one and outed them before placing them on ignore because their woman-hating, stupid response gave them away (they attempted to take-down radfem ideology under the guise of wanting to know more). yep, bingo. so obviously maab. no other women came to their defense, including the mods so i have renewed hope for a feminist revolution. absolutely EVIL how these TWs are lying outright about their biology now as well. i’ve had enough and i’m sharing this stuff with the women in my world who need to put words to their frustration with this appropriation garbage from males. thanks for the new post, Dave… loving it. 😉

    Keith… just ewwww. LOL.

    Like

    Reply
  69. ball buster

    A standard conservative calling myself feminist? Oh geez! LOL! That’s amusing, because I openly state on my blog several times I am a liberal. I’m not mainstream, but I am a liberal nonetheless. It’s almost embarrassing to talk politics because I run the risk of being lumped in with these mainstream liberals, or having to deal with the eventual accusation of being conservative. “You’re not with me, so you must be a conservative!” Oh, that’s such a crock of shit.

    And I am not a moderate, either. I’ve been accused of that, too. Nope, I am a far left liberal that believes in “scary” things like socialism and putting the working class before profits and the rich (as well as a very W I D E gap between church and state). I think the difference between me and mainstream liberals (and conservatives!) is that I don’t see politics as a vehicle to express my personal beliefs. IMO making sure people have adequate nutrition, health care, rights as workers and a healthy, sane society to live in has nothing to do with my opinions about anything. That’s what my blog is for. lol

    Like

    Reply
  70. Nicky

    Exactly, that’s why some twanz will do almost everything to try and enter women’s only space including pretending to be a feminist and pretending to be intersex. All they want is nothing more than to redefine what women and intersex are in their own image.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a rilly rilly twanzphobic reply, go on, dares ya!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s