Tootsie of the Week: Stephanie Collins and his penis!

Awww, bless, this is Stephanie Collins, born as Stephen Collins (and should really also get special mention in GallusMag’s Lazy Tranny Name Changes post).

Steph’ (LOL, see what I did there with the abbreviation?) made the papers yesterday for the “bathroom incident” at a supermarket in Surrey UK. He was told (politely I believe) by staff, after having used the female toilets, that he should use the disabled toilets.

zmog! The staff member was not catering to Steph’s gender delusion, mwahwahah, demand apologies, make the papers, get everyone to recognise what a Special Femmy Snowflake you are!!!

So, yes, the supermarket are playing ball(s) with the delusion, and are going to do a personal apology to our dearest Steph.

Now, the thing of it is, the staff member was likely looking out not only for the (majority) of customers (women with children), but also the potential bad press or lawsuits should anything untoward have happened to the women or children in the female bathroom. It’s a fair call really, because dear ol’ Steph, looks like a man in drag, and could easily be some sort of sexual pervert targeting either women or children. And let’s face it, supermarkets, because of society’s set-up of sex roles, most of the customers are female, and many have children in tow.

Not only that, but staff (and customers, because it could have been a customer that alerted staff) had damn good reason to complain, because dear ol’ Steph is still packing his meat and two veg under his skirt. Not only that, but dear ol’ Steph still does not yet have that *magical* bit of paper from the Gender Recognition dudes. Coz, yanno, a bit of paper magically turns a dude into a doll. Penis-notwithstanding.

Ms Collins, who has been living as a woman for the last two years (the length of time you need to qualify) is currently awaiting a change to her birth certificate and a gender recognition certificate, both are due in a couple of weeks.

Steph’s legal standing is currently still that of “dude”. He has no legal right to use the women’s toilets, and yet is kicking up a stink because his delusional sensibilities have been offended. Hey Sainsburys, if you consider that most of your customers are FAABs and a tiny percentage are M2Ts, why so worried about losing the tranny dollar eh?

Her children are all supportive of her plans to undergo the full gender reassignment operation.

Nice to know he is still packing penis. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Thanks to UndercoverPunk for find our Tootsie. And also for finding the Freudian slip in the article:

Under the Gender Recognition Act 2004 transgendered people have the legal right to be recognised in their acquired agenda.

LOL, yes, they do have an aquired agenda!

But again, the article is really misleading, Steph’ still does not have legal recognition of his dress-ups, so throwing that into the article is a big fat red herring.

Don’t forget to check out our other Tootsies.

Here is the full article about dear ol’ Steph.

Sainsbury’s tells sex-change woman to use disabled toilet

Jul 8 2011 By Vicki Eltis

A TRANSGENDER woman was left feeling embarrassed after staff at Sainsbury’s in Walton told her to use the disabled toilet.

Stephanie Collins, 55, feels she has been discriminated against after visiting the store at The Heart.

She needed to use the toilet facilities but as she came out of the ladies she was blocked by a member of staff who told her she should use the disabled toilet.

Miss Collins, a carer, said: “I told the lady I was not disabled and suggested it would be inappropriate. She said ‘I can see that’ but told me to use the disabled toilet. She became defensive. I was left feeling quite embarrassed and rather awkward, but I’m not angry. I feel sorry for Sainsbury’s if they cannot train up its staff to deal tactfully with people.”

Miss Collins, of Hersham Road, Walton, changed her name from Stephen in 2008 but believes she knew she was born into the wrong body from the age of three, when he then asked his older sister when it would be his turn to change. Since the incident Miss Collins has written to the store manager.

Under the Gender Recognition Act 2004 transgendered people have the legal right to be recognised in their acquired agenda.

Ms Collins, who has been living as a woman for the last two years (the length of time you need to qualify) is currently awaiting a change to her birth certificate and a gender recognition certificate, both are due in a couple of weeks.

Former mechanic, Miss Collins, who is a regular church-goer and has four children from a previous relationship, is known as ‘muddy’ by her youngest daughters. Her children are all supportive of her plans to undergo the full gender reassignment operation.

She added: “I get wolf whistled, sometimes it is a joke, but other times it’s not. I do get compliments. I am completely loving my life as it is now and I am at peace with myself but I was disempowered that day. If everyone else can accept it why can’t they.”

A Sainsbury’s spokesman said: “We would like to apologise unreservedly for any offence caused. We pride ourselves on our high standards in customer service, something that clearly has not been met in this instance.

“Our store manager will be writing to Miss Collins to apologise in person. We hope this will not prevent her from shopping with us in the future.”

52 thoughts on “Tootsie of the Week: Stephanie Collins and his penis!

  1. T. Laurel Sulfate, Snarkurchin

    Steph, Honey, when you get wolf whistled, it’s never not a joke. And when women get wolf whistled, it’s NEVER a compliment. It’s a threat, and in order to understand that you’d have to be an actual, rapable woman who’s been made aware of her rapability all her life. At the very least, you’d have to be able and willing to imagine what being a woman is, to put yourself figuratively in her shoes and not just literally into a pair of pretty pink stilettos (or whatever).

    This is what men think being a woman is: being harassed on the street and enjoying the attention. That’s this guy’s proof of ladytude. Reckon Steph will know he’s come a long way, Baby, when some dude on the internet tells him to “make me a sandwich.”

    And they don’t even play by their own rules! He can’t even stay out of the Ladies’ until he has the stupid piece of paper…and the shop is bending over backward to accommodate him. If good customer service requires letting him into the female bathroom because he wants to be there, it requires letting me wander around employees-only areas because I want to work for Sainsbury’s. If anyone questions me, I can simply say I am an employee, I’ll one day have a piece of paper to prove it, and anyone who points out reality to me is disempowering me. One is as at least as preposterous as the other.

    Like

    Reply
  2. pmsrhino

    I’m sorry, I don’t see the issue here. Steph’ was asked to use the DISABLED toilets, not the MALE toilets. Soooooo… what’s the big deal, here? Is Steph’ implying that by NOT being able to use the toilet specifically labeled WOMAN that means that he’s not a “woman”? So are disabled women or women who have multiple children that have to follow them into the restroom or women who just have an emergency and the other restrooms are taken suddenly NOT women too? I always thought that using the gender neutral disabled bathrooms (or having “special” genderless bathrooms) was the best solution to the trans bathroom problem. If women don’t want them in the women’s restroom (for obvious reasons) and trans don’t want to use the men’s bathroom for fear of being beaten or raped, then why not have a “genderless” bathroom set up for them?

    Oh, no, I guess that would mean we are othering them or discriminating against them or something. Nope! For trans it’s their way or NO WAY! They have to feel both included AND special! How dare we not bend to their will! -_-

    Like

    Reply
  3. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    Good idea snarkurchin, we should all wander into the Sainsbury’s staff room, sit down and have a cuppa. After all, we truly believe we are Sainsbury’s staff, even though we have no legal status as such.

    Actually, even the damn headline on that article is bullshit “sex-change woman” ummm, he has NOT had a sex change, he also has no legal status as ‘woman’ either. His full legal status at the present time is that of MALE CROSS-DRESSER. That’s right folks, male cross-dresser, who has no right to enter a female SEX-segregated toilet. Female toilets are for females btw.

    We now have the riddle “what is the difference between a tranzwoman and a male cross-dresser?” Answer: “Two years of dress-ups and a bit of paper. Surgery optional.”

    Yes PMS, in the past I have suddenly become “un-female” by using unisex toilets, disabled toilets, male toilets. Oh the identity shame of it all. Actually, at one small train station, the female toilet is the disabled toilet, so perhaps we females (and male disabled persons) should kick up a stink because we are not either disabled or female (respectively). I was really desperate when I used the male toilets at my local Sainsburys a year or two ago. The female toilets were closed for cleaning, with several women waiting, I was busting, no males in the male toilets so went in there (yukky smelly btw). Another woman followed me too. They were taking forever on the cleaning, and I don’t know why they had to close the toilets. I now blame Sainsburys for an identity crisis from which I will never likely recover from. They don’t even have squirrel-identified toilets either. I need to sue for a million pounds.

    Also, a reminder that he had already used the female toilets too – which is why I reckon some of the female customers complained to staff. He must have been in there a hell of a long time. Probably in there, hanging around, hoping estrogen would waft his way. He was likely in there hanging around like a creepy cross-dressing pervert, which is why the female customers got anxious.

    Like

    Reply
  4. rebel13

    This is soo stoopid because at every event I’ve been to in the last five years, the genderqueers are always whining about how the perfect solution IS those one-seater dealios so that no one HAS to go into a bathroom that’s gendered, just in case they don’t identify with ANY gender, yanno. Or whatever. But then, this guy gets upset when that exact scenario is available and he’s asked to use it. WTF. These people make no sense most of the time.

    (OIC pmsrhino hit this point before I did, good on you.)

    Like

    Reply
  5. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    The only problem I have with single-stall, sex-neutral toilets is that they ALL end up stinking (with wee all over the floor). I know this from experience as most of the public toilets in my city are of this type. I used them twice, and that was twice too many.

    Like

    Reply
  6. myrtle

    What an insipid looking male. That would even be an ugly cocker spaniel.

    I note Mr. Stephen Collins is a “carer”. This means disabled women, elderly women will be forced to accept HIM performing personal care for them. If any woman didn’t want him to do that, she would threatened, ostracized, and called names, literally or figuratively.

    Why do these sick fucks choose caring jobs? Because those jobs give them de facto protected sexual assault privileges on women, so they can walk around with boners under their dresses or just plain get off to their mentally ill fetish with impunity.

    Heterosexual AND gay men know this and don’t give a damn. How did they get rights so easily which in many cases, for women’s rights, we still do not have after hundreds of years of even dying for it.

    The white male gay and queer rights advocacy groups fight for them with all their privileged educations, connections, know-how and access.

    Male rights uber alles.

    Like

    Reply
  7. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    There isn’t even any sex protection for females anyway, as far as carers go. In the UK, they frequently send male carers to look after females. That just is not right at all. Everyone who needs a carer IS vulnerable, and they should be able to have sex selected carers. This of course means NO PENISES on any so-called women.

    See also UCP’s latest post on the no-penis rule.
    http://undercoverpunk.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/trans-harm-reduction-legal-considerations/

    Like

    Reply
  8. myrtle

    It’s not just no men, it’s no psychotic men the med profession shines on into their autogynophillia/cutting/dysmorphia 80 alarm nutso freeko delusion around the children, for example, or white men. But for women, the elderly and disabled, sure, send them there. They don’t matter to society anymore anyway. The nutso freekos do however, because men know these nutjobs are MEN. It’s the same bullshit as with racism. Men get racism. It involves men.

    Like

    Reply
  9. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    And a right fuckin tootsie he is too.
    Note also that I changed the post title, to make mention of his ‘concealed weapon’ that he sashays into the female toilets with…

    And I hope he googles himself, so that he knows just how much of an entitled prat he really is.

    Like

    Reply
  10. GallusMag

    “And when women get wolf whistled, it’s NEVER a compliment. It’s a threat, and in order to understand that you’d have to be an actual, rapable woman who’s been made aware of her rapability all her life.”
    This is the key difference between men that want to be women and actual women. Autogynephiles believe women=sex object, therefore they=woman=sex object. And they can’t understand actual women at all. I’ve seen several trans argue against unisex bathrooms and “agree with” women on the issue – but the reason they give is that women don’t want men to see them when we are “not at our best”. hahahaha. That is the actual reason they give. They don’t want men to see them when they’re not being “sexay”. Hahahaha. They have no concept of real women’s lives, even after “transition”. Men also enjoy prostituting themselves. Rather than troll parks and restrooms for sex like closeted gay men they prostitute themselves as a way of getting sex, and as “confirmation” of their womanliness (sex-objectness). It’s not about the money. Even world renowned attorney David Burgess (who was recently murdered by another tran who allegedly through him in front of a subway train) used to prostitute himself just for “fun”. These guys have zero concept of being female.

    Like

    Reply
  11. myrtle

    I think women don’t want men in their bathrooms because they know WHY men are there, to threaten them, and enjoy women feeling threatened, even if they don’t do anything. I also think animals, like dogs and cats, cover their feces because it’s dangerous to obviously be shitting around a predator, and what female animal doesn’t have a predator?

    Sled dogs eat their shit. They do it for two reasons: because there’s no way to cover it and bury it for their safety, like women they are “tied down” and relatively defenceless against their predators, who are just sniffing the air for this scent that proves the dogs extra special vulnerability. And the final reason dogs eat their own shit, if some other dog doesn’t get it first, is more of the same above, safety, and because it has nutrition and is warm.

    I think some of this wariness around predators plays a role with women not wanting to shit around men, or have men smell that they are shitting/vulnerable. It’s got nothing to do with daintiness and manners.

    It’s got to do with FUCKING LIFE AND DEATH.

    Like

    Reply
  12. myrtle

    And of yeah, I just came from a public washroom where when another women exited her stall, we both shreiked and jumped. A small Chinese woman.

    When I go into a public washroom, I walk down the line and kick the doors open full. If a door doesn’t swing hard and hit the wall, or if a door is closed even if it has an “out of order” sign on it, I turn around and get out.

    Men can piss anywhere they want, and they do.

    I think women should start doing that with themselves and their kids. Pick a nice grassy area if you are at an outdoor event, or in the “reserved parking” stall, and tell your kids they can shit there. You can pee. You will be a lot safer even if you get a ticket of some kind, than taking your chances with a flat out bug in a women’s washroom.

    I realise that’s never going to happen, because women have thousands of year’s of instinctively knowing it is not safe to squat, or shit or pee, because men will take advantage of you if they can.

    Like

    Reply
  13. thebewilderness

    I struggle with the man made language sometimes and this is one of the times. This person would be a transvestite, would he not? His sex is male but his costume is that of the opposite sex stereotype. So when they put up the Trans umbrella it shelters anyone who does not perform their own sexual stereotype as defined and prescribed by male authority.
    I could wish the Trans activists would urge for the legalization of a third sexual designation rather than playing these mind games with performance art. The road they are going is going to create more legal problems than it solves.

    Like

    Reply
  14. myrtle

    I heard that term used the other day TBW, prior to which you were the only one I’d seen doing that.

    I think we’ve started a third here. We use MtT, and FtT.

    (Jilla)

    Like

    Reply
  15. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    rather than playing these mind games with performance art
    I love it!

    They won’t ever fight for a third designation. They want all of the little gains that FABs have, but at the same time, want Speshul Snowflake status in addition.
    I know what they can call a third designation: Snowflake.
    Female, Male, Snowflake.

    And of course, the other big elephant-in-the-room problem is their terminology, “transgender” – they don’t tranz nothin’ with their gender at all, they roll around in their ‘gender’ and dress it up! They do attempt to surgically change the appearance of their sex, so they are indeed, transsexual. And Snowflakes.
    https://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/twanz-wot/

    Like

    Reply
  16. Undercover Punk

    TransSEXuals have a process for revising their birth certificates which retains a black and white distinction between legal status:male or :female. This was a fairly clean solution. But some people were obviously not happy with it. They wanted more!!
    Trans GENDER bullshit seeks to blur the lines, allowing transvestites to claim access to SEX segregated spaces by confusing it with gender and eliminating surgical requirements for SEX “changes.” that’s what really makes me mad. They already have the legal means to live as the opposite sex. it’s not enough. Trans gender insists on redefining FEMALE with no regard for our physical reality.

    Like

    Reply
  17. Undercover Punk

    Which is not to say that interrupting ones natural-born reproductive functioning amounts to BECOMING the other sex. Just that it is legally recognized that way. Which is different than doing NOTHING to your reproductive functioning at all. As tootsie here, probably has not.

    Like

    Reply
  18. Undercover Punk

    Hey TBW, I don’t know all the laws every where all the time, of course. But that’s what they’re doing, for example, in Iran with the homo sex-changes, you know? And of course in the US, it goes state by state. But over the past 40 years, almost everywhere has some way to change the “sex” on your legal documents.

    Like

    Reply
  19. myrtle

    That’s true here too UCP. Also, it’s free!!! (Want a copy of your birth certificate, it’s going to cost you) Where I live they do not charge for “change of gender” on a document. Now it didn’t say where that would be, birth cert, driver’s license. Anyway, we can be damn sure the document that is getting Tweetie Bird’s “gender” changed will say SEX not GENDER.

    (Eating potato salad. mmmm).

    Like

    Reply
  20. luckynkl

    “All the world is a stage. And all the men and women merely players.” So sayeth Shakespeare. But what Shakespeare seems to have forgotten to mention is who gets to write the play and assign all the roles – or edit them on a whim. But of course, we don’t need Shakespeare to know this. We already know men are nothing but players. Lies on the hoof and masters in the art of bullshit and manipulation. Which is really what separates men from animals. Animals don’t have the ability to bullshit each other. Maybe it’s time to bring the curtain down on the play?

    Hmmm… that gives me a scathingly brilliant idea. Women can simply not teach their male children how to talk. I’ve heard that if children aren’t taught language by age 5, they never really get the hang of it. So let’s just take language away from the boys. Without language, they will no longer have the ability to bullshit anyone. They won’t be able to lead, have wars, organize or have gov’ts, religions, Fox news, blogs, or much of anything without language. We’d never have to listen to their lies, misogyny or bullshit again. Can’t we just revert them back to being monkeys?

    Like

    Reply
  21. cherryblossomlife

    Yes the tranny dollare is more important than the FAAB dollar, despite the fact that almost all the customers are FAAB. This makes me so angry. The word “angry” doesn’t cut it. Incandescent. That’s better.

    Like

    Reply
  22. survivorthriver

    I found something odd on this topic, so will share here, see if there’s any moth holes in this research on “Phantom Penis”. Play the jaws music now and here’s the link (hope that’s okay):

    http://www.consciousentities.com/?p=56

    Here’s the intro 2 paragraphs if you’re too busy to go see the whole, but for those of you who can stomach it, I wonder whatchy’all make of this mirage?

    It often happens that when someone has had a limb amputated, they experience feelings in the limb they haven’t got any more – the ‘phantom limb’ phenomenon. The phantoms may be just temporary, a curious by-product of the operation. Sometimes the feelings are partial – where an arm has been removed, for example, patients may feel as though they still had their hand, but attached to the shoulder without any intervening arm. Sometimes the experience is more of a problem, with feelings of intense pain in the amputated part which won’t go away and can’t be treated by normal means.

    I therefore winced slightly on learning that as well as phantom limbs, there are phantom penises, experienced by those who have undergone a penectomy (a word which is well worthy of a wince in itself). V.S.Ramachandran, who devised an ingenious way of using mirrors to help people with phantom limb pain, by fooling the brain into briefly believing that the missing limb was back, has now turned his attention to penises, together with P.D. McGeoch. This time the research is not about pain relief, however, but gender identity, where the possession or lack of a penis is clearly highly relevant.

    Like

    Reply
  23. survivorthriver

    In case there is Phantom Sex delusion is underway at the same time, a mirror so twanz can check for a reflection of any actual partner as well?

    Like

    Reply
  24. Sargasso Sea

    possession or lack of a penis is clearly highly relevant.

    Rilly?! Us dum radfems hadn’t noticed. 😛

    Like

    Reply
  25. myrtle

    The Depenised one would want a a variety of mirrors:

    Side view mirrors
    Rear view mirrors
    The Aforementioned compact mirror
    Teeny mirrors attached to a lipstick tube
    Fun House mirrors
    Magnifying mirrors
    “It’s all done with mirrors” mirrors
    Convex mirrors
    Survival kit signaling mirror

    Like

    Reply
  26. Sargasso Sea

    Or how about a big bubble of mirror, like “the Boy in the Plastic Bubble”, so that the twanz can go around all day and all night seeing all around them only themselves; their whole world will be nothing but a reflection of themselves.

    Although, in that case, the bubble mirror is entirely redundant! 😛

    Like

    Reply
  27. womononajourney

    Honestly, if when I had short hair and was occasionally mistaken for a man, a store manager–or another women–told me to leave the women’s restroom, I would just have run out with major embarrassment. I sure as hell would not have had the nerve to demand an apology from the store manager. That’s what female socialization does to you.

    I’m learning that more and more of these transwomen still have dicks in tact. So, they may “present” as a woman, but actually have the parts, not to mention the experiences, of a man. That’s really, really creepy, frankly.

    Like

    Reply
  28. Mary Sunshine

    Well, if anybody wants to hassle me in the women’s washroom, I’ll just roar at them ya wanna see my epesiotomy scar?? or my tubal ligation scar ?? or maybe my abdominal stretch marks ?? That’ll shut them up fast.

    Like

    Reply
  29. Sargasso Sea

    What, Mary, and have them pass out from the horror of it all, hit their heads and have you arrested for assault?!

    Like

    Reply
  30. GallusMag

    Women think I am a man in the restroom all. the. time.
    It becomes second nature when they give you “that” (frightened) look to just say “hi” in a friendly but disinterested (unthreatening) way on the way to the stall to set them at ease. Works. every. time. Then again I’m a friendly person with a friendly face.

    Like

    Reply
  31. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    Yes WOAJ, the female socialisation. It is stinking of male entitlement that they behave this way. Now, if they wanted to become actual “real women” like they pretend they want to be, then it’s put up and shut up. But, they want it both ways, always.

    So, they may “present” as a woman, but actually have the parts, not to mention the experiences, of a man. That’s really, really creepy, frankly.

    Yeah, most of these ones kicking up the stink to get into women’s toilets do seem to have their parts intact. And most never pass as well as they think they do – they still look like dudes in drag. That alone is enough to creep out the average female.

    Like

    Reply
  32. KatieS

    Ok, I do use public restrooms a lot. I drink a lot of water and just go when I need to, I don’t wait unless the restroom is gross, etc. To be honest, I’ve never seen anyone I thought was a male. But since reading these blogs I’ve become more suspicious and a bit more cautious.

    I go to a gym where they have individual changing rooms. I figured it was for women who may have had a mastectomy or something similar, and were shy about undressing around people. Now I’m beginning to wonder about that. Yes, I’m becoming more suspicious and cautious. I’ll bet if a whole lot of women knew about penis-persons being in women’s rooms as much as they apparently are, issues would be raised.

    Like

    Reply
  33. cherryblossomlife

    I’ve mentioned it before, but when I went to a feminst conference last year in the UK, there was an old bloke *hanging* *around* in the women’s toilets there. He was actually reading the newspaper next to the sinks, and he stayed in there a long time. I know this because afterwards I was in the courtyard below and looked up to the window where I knew the toilets were and I could see him, still in there.
    I’m annoyed with myself that I didn’t say anything at the time, but I was honestly shocked and to be honest, the fear factor came into play. You don’t know how a man is going to react to confrontation when he’s the type of person who is weird enough to get his jollies off by skulking in women’s toilets.
    Not one woman said a word to him. OUr female socialization came into play, and we ignored it and pretended it wasn’t happening.
    Now *that* is a man with a rapist mentality, because for him, part of the kick was knowing that we, as females, would probably not confront him. He was a pretty big bloke too, wearing a woman’s coat.

    Like

    Reply
  34. Pingback: Excuse me, which way to the Squirrel Bathroom? | twanzphobic since forever

  35. iamnotanumber06

    You folks have GOT to check this tootsie out: transgenderstorm.yolasite.com/
    He’s like a goldmine of tootsieness!

    Like

    Reply
  36. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    Hiya “not-6” and welcome.
    I do believe that this particular tootsie (and yeppers, he qualifies bigtime) is ‘our old mate’ Mr Vagina Acquirer. The parts of the story that I knew seem to match up, although this new site goes into more detail ! Unfortunately, cannot confirm the connection as Mr Vagina Acquirer has deleted his old blog. But I see by latest news that he now amuses himself via selling his acquired vagina in prostitution.

    https://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/laydee-making-pass-or-fail/
    https://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/snowflake-fail/

    But certainly, the photos make him worthy of (yet another) post to highlight his speshul snowflakeness. rotflmao.

    Like

    Reply
  37. myrtle

    I was thinking about your Squirrel bathroom problems today, when I took seed to the birdfeeder at a vacationing friend’s home. Do you know where your Squirrel kin go to the bathroom? Right in the middle of the feeder on top of the seeds. I think we have to get you some StT lessons Dave. You’re doing it wrong.

    Like

    Reply
  38. KatieS

    Myrtle, that was hilarious! But is it StT or F2ST or F2TS? And do we refer to Dave as squir or squim or squeer? My brain will soon explode :D. But, we need accuracy when it comes to jendah, after all 😉

    Plus, there are those squirrel deflecting devices that actually keep squirrels from being able to use the birdfeeder bathrooms at all. It’s a hard life for someone like squir, er, squim, er, squeer, ok, then, just Dave. . .

    Like

    Reply
  39. myrtle

    LOL. I love those pronouns. I think we need to go easy on Dave. Sqeer=im is just in the “living as a Squirrel” stage. No drugs yet. Although it’s sounding to me like maybe you’re on drugs?

    Like

    Reply
  40. KatieS

    Kind of on drugs, legal ones, plus seriously sleep deprived. My doc has me taking thyroid and trying to find the right dose. Too high a dose (today), and it keeps you up. I’m going to try to sleep soon.

    Dave is now in the “living as a squirrel” stage? Is he nuts? (puns are like a drug for me, too).

    Like

    Reply
  41. KatieS

    oops, I posted too fast. It should read “Is sque nuts?” Really, I think it’s time for bed soon. . .

    Like

    Reply
  42. FabLibber / DaveSquirrel Post author

    Look, I AM living as a squirrel ok?
    (although I won’t admit that I want to keep my human-privilege AND live as a squirrel too, ssshhh)

    And yeah, I will pee where ever I damn-well want to pee. Particularly if I want to mark my turf.

    On a more serious note, do you think turf-marking is a fundamental basis for the M2T obsession with female bathrooms? Their demand to pee in female bathrooms is a definite turf claiming, that we accept them in our space, as ‘women’. Just brainstorming.

    Like

    Reply
  43. Undercover Punk

    Ha! Turf marking! I love it. The strong animalistic parallel is very compelling. I’m convinced!! It’s no less ridiculous than the bullshit “science” trans attempt to leverage to justify their jendah. Run with it!!!!!

    Like

    Reply
  44. Sargasso Sea

    I’ve long held that ANY man will mark turf anywhere. As separatists will attest: let a man into your house for any reason, for any amount of time, and they will try to use your bathroom.

    The only other places that were LEGALLY out of bounds are no longer thanks to their trans brothers.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a rilly rilly twanzphobic reply, go on, dares ya!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s