Congruity – the word of wankers

Ah yes, we hear that word thrown about a lot by transjacktivists and their supporters.

They throw around terms like ‘gender congruity’ because it sounds oh-so-terribly official, and steeped in academic research and theory.

All they are trying to say is ‘[internal] gender aligned with one’s physical sex’, which is so simple (and bland sounding). Yep, let’s dress it up in posh terms and see if anyone buys it.

But, if they make it simple like that, it does sound a bit stupid doesn’t it? Aligning one’s ‘internal gender’ with one’s physical sex. If they try to sell it like that, most of the public are going to wise-up to the crackpot idea.

But wait! There’s moar! [ginsu knife reference :P]

Like I said in my previous post:

The twanz argument effectively goes along the lines of ‘sex’ being the mutable element, and ‘gender’ being the immutable element, because ‘sex’ (the sexual characteristics) should be the ones to change to accommodate ‘gender’ (being the airy-fairy so-called internal state).

Ah, so we are changing the outside thing, the hard thing to change, to conform to the inside thing, the easier thing to change.

Well, if I “feel like a panda inside” or ‘panda’ is my ‘internal identity’, then 99.9% of the world is going to think I am nuts to change my outside to match the inside. Panda congruity! Yep, sounds rather stoopid when I put it like that.

When one has to use ‘posh words’ in order to legitimise the theories and concepts, then chances are that the underlying theories and concepts are a big stinky poo.

Transjacktivists and their supporters like to play ‘hide the simple reality’ by dressing things up. Oh yeah, they like to dress things up, particularly when they have to have clothing congruity with their jendah.

Wankers.

7 thoughts on “Congruity – the word of wankers

  1. maggie

    Right. This. Tranz MtT hate women. They are men and that’s it. They are misogynists. Through and through.

    “Transjacktivists and their supporters like to play ‘hide the simple reality’ by dressing things up. Oh yeah, they like to dress things up, particularly when they have to have clothing congruity with their jendah.”

    Yes, yes, yes, and then some 🙂

    Like

    Reply
  2. FAB Libber

    What are you, like 4? 😛

    I thought I might have reached some sort of swearing limit for the day, so had to resort to stinkypoo. I really wanted to say Great Steaming Turd.

    I iz all grown-ups now. 😛

    Like

    Reply
  3. maggie

    Stinky poo I love it.

    Be four. be four. be four. be four.

    Seriously. I’ve had a run in with a trans today and they are one big heap of misogyny right back at you. I hate that they ignore the RELEVANT. And carry on, airy fairy, not that I want to engage in homophobic language…

    Like

    Reply
  4. ball buster

    Well Fab, the only difference between your situation 😉 and theirs, is that pandas actually do exist and gender doesn’t. It exists only in the Kingdom of Make Believe, the only place where fairies, dragons, otherkin, and Thundercats live.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Jendah: The emperor’s new clothes | twanzphobic since forever

  6. Pingback: Twanz-wot? | twanzphobic since forever

Leave a rilly rilly twanzphobic reply, go on, dares ya!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s